Integrity
Overview of Sample Integrity
- Definition: Sample integrity refers to the quality and condition of the sample at the time of analysis, ensuring that it accurately represents the biological state of the cells or particles of interest
-
Importance:
- Accurate Results: Poor sample integrity can lead to inaccurate and unreliable results
- Reproducibility: Maintaining sample integrity is essential for reproducible experiments
- Valid Conclusions: Only high-quality samples can provide valid conclusions about the biological system being studied
-
Key Factors Affecting Sample Integrity:
- Collection
- Handling
- Storage
- Viability
Collection
-
Best Practices:
- Proper Technique: Collect samples using appropriate techniques to minimize cell damage and contamination
- Appropriate Containers: Use containers that are compatible with the sample and that do not introduce contaminants
- Anticoagulants: Use appropriate anticoagulants (e.g., EDTA, heparin) to prevent clotting of blood samples
- Timeliness: Process samples as quickly as possible after collection to minimize changes in cell phenotype and viability
-
Specific Considerations:
- Blood: Collect blood samples using a standardized protocol, and use appropriate needle size and collection tubes
- Bone Marrow: Collect bone marrow aspirates using sterile techniques, and ensure that the sample is representative of the bone marrow compartment
- Solid Tissue: Collect tissue samples using appropriate surgical techniques, and preserve the tissue in appropriate media or fixatives
- Body Fluids: Collect body fluids using sterile techniques, and ensure that the sample is free from contaminants
-
Potential Issues:
- Cell Lysis: Mechanical stress during collection can cause cell lysis and release of intracellular components
- Clotting: Incomplete mixing of blood samples with anticoagulants can lead to clotting
- Contamination: Introduction of bacteria, fungi, or other microorganisms can compromise sample integrity
Handling
-
Best Practices:
- Gentle Handling: Handle samples gently to avoid cell damage and aggregation
- Temperature Control: Maintain samples at appropriate temperatures to preserve cell viability and phenotype
- Minimize Exposure: Minimize exposure to air, light, and other environmental factors that can degrade the sample
- Mixing: Mix samples gently to ensure that cells are evenly distributed
-
Specific Considerations:
- Blood: Avoid vigorous shaking or vortexing of blood samples, and keep samples at room temperature or on ice
- Bone Marrow: Avoid prolonged exposure of bone marrow aspirates to air, and keep samples on ice or at 4°C
- Solid Tissue: Keep tissue samples in appropriate media or fixatives to prevent degradation
- Body Fluids: Handle body fluids carefully to avoid spillage or contamination
-
Potential Issues:
- Cell Aggregation: Improper handling can lead to cell aggregation, which can interfere with analysis
- Enzymatic Degradation: Enzymes released from damaged cells can degrade proteins and other molecules
- Oxidation: Exposure to air can cause oxidation of cellular components
Storage
-
Best Practices:
- Appropriate Temperature: Store samples at appropriate temperatures to preserve cell viability and phenotype
- Cryopreservation: Cryopreserve samples in liquid nitrogen or at -80°C for long-term storage
- Stabilization: Use appropriate stabilization reagents (e.g., cell stabilizers) to prevent degradation during storage
- Controlled Thawing: Thaw cryopreserved samples rapidly and gently to minimize cell damage
-
Specific Considerations:
- Blood: Store whole blood samples at room temperature or on ice for short-term storage, or cryopreserve PBMCs for long-term storage
- Bone Marrow: Store bone marrow aspirates at -80°C or in liquid nitrogen for long-term storage
- Solid Tissue: Store tissue samples in appropriate fixatives (e.g., formalin) or cryopreserve for long-term storage
- Body Fluids: Store body fluids at -80°C or in liquid nitrogen for long-term storage
-
Potential Issues:
- Cell Death: Improper storage can lead to cell death and loss of viable cells
- Antigen Degradation: Antigens can degrade during storage, leading to inaccurate results
- Crystal Formation: Slow freezing can cause crystal formation, which can damage cells
Viability
-
Best Practices:
- Assess Viability: Assess cell viability using appropriate methods (e.g., dye exclusion, Annexin V staining)
- Use Viable Cells: Use only viable cells for analysis to ensure accurate results
- Remove Dead Cells: Remove dead cells and debris from the sample to improve data quality
- Optimize Staining: Optimize staining protocols to minimize cell damage and maximize signal intensity
-
Specific Considerations:
- Dye Exclusion: Use dyes such as trypan blue or propidium iodide to identify dead cells
- Apoptosis Markers: Use markers such as Annexin V and caspase-3 to detect apoptotic cells
- Fixation: Fix cells to preserve cell morphology and prevent degradation
-
Potential Issues:
- False Positives: Dead cells can bind non-specifically to antibodies, leading to false-positive results
- False Negatives: Dead cells can lose expression of certain antigens, leading to false-negative results
- Data Distortion: The presence of dead cells and debris can distort the data and make it difficult to interpret
Methods for Assessing Cell Viability
- Dye Exclusion: Trypan Blue: A dye that is excluded by viable cells but enters cells with damaged membranes Propidium Iodide (PI): A dye that only enters cells with damaged membranes and binds to DNA
- Metabolic Activity Assays: MTT Assay: Measures the reduction of MTT (a yellow tetrazole) to formazan (a purple dye) by metabolically active cells Resazurin Assay: Measures the reduction of resazurin (a blue dye) to resorufin (a pink fluorescent dye) by metabolically active cells
- Apoptosis Assays: Annexin V Staining: Detects phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer leaflet of the cell membrane, an early marker of apoptosis Caspase Activation Assays: Detects the activation of caspases, a family of proteases that play a key role in apoptosis
- DNA Fragmentation Assays: *TUNEL Assay: Detects DNA fragmentation, a late marker of apoptosis
- Flow Cytometry-Based Viability Assays: *Combination of dye exclusion and apoptosis markers for multiparameter analysis
Troubleshooting Sample Integrity Issues
-
Low Event Count:
-
Possible Causes:
- Cell death during collection, handling, or storage
- Loss of cells during sample preparation
- Incorrect instrument settings
-
Troubleshooting Steps:
- Optimize collection, handling, and storage protocols
- Minimize cell loss during sample preparation
- Verify instrument settings
-
Possible Causes:
-
High Background Noise:
-
Possible Causes:
- Dead cells and debris
- Autofluorescence
- Non-specific binding of antibodies
-
Troubleshooting Steps:
- Remove dead cells and debris
- Reduce autofluorescence
- Use blocking reagents
-
Possible Causes:
-
Poor Resolution:
-
Possible Causes:
- Cell aggregates
- Degraded antigens
- Incorrect staining
-
Troubleshooting Steps:
- Reduce cell aggregates
- Optimize staining protocols
-
Possible Causes:
-
Inaccurate Results:
-
Possible Causes:
- Compromised sample integrity
- Incorrect data analysis
- Instrument malfunction
-
Troubleshooting Steps:
- Verify sample integrity
- Review data analysis methods
- Inspect instrument for malfunctions
-
Possible Causes:
Key Terms
- Sample Integrity: The quality and condition of the sample at the time of analysis
- Collection: The process of obtaining the sample
- Handling: The process of manipulating the sample
- Storage: The process of preserving the sample
- Viability: The percentage of live cells in the sample
- Dye Exclusion: A method for assessing cell viability using dyes that are excluded by viable cells
- Apoptosis: Programmed cell death